Loading events…
Loading events…
Loading event details…
2025 Ctpba 職業撞球巡迴賽 -第一站/CTPBA 9-Ball Tour I
ctpba9balltouri • 新北市, TW

670.8
RSI Score
Feb 6-8, 2025
Date Range
96
Players
236
Matches
-
Prize Money
ctpba9balltouri
Updated Aug 03, 2026, 04:29:21 PM
2025 Ctpba 職業撞球巡迴賽 -第一站/CTPBA 9-Ball Tour I brought together 96 players in 9-Ball at 新北市, TW, with 173 recorded matches.
Ping Chung Ko won the event ahead of Jung Lin Chang.
The strongest matchups by combined player rating included Jung Lin Chang vs. Ping Chung Ko (10-11); Jung Lin Chang vs. Robbie Capito (10-2); Pin Yi Ko vs. Liu Yun Cheng (9-10).
No major rating upsets were detected from the recorded matches.
Chia Chia Chou delivered one of the standout performances, finishing 17th after entering around #48 by effective rating.
Ping Chung Ko (1st).
| Name | Pos.Position | Payout | |
|---|---|---|---|
Record: 7-0 | 757.1(+7.8) | 1 | - |
Record: 6-2 | 721.9(+27.7) | 2 | - |
Record: 6-1 | 654.8(+23.5) | 3 | - |
Record: 5-1 | 684(+20.6) | 3 | - |
Record: 4-1 | 662.5(+33.9) | 5 | - |
Record: 4-1 | 699(-4.7) | 5 | - |
Record: 4-1 | 652.2(+22.3) | 5 | - |
Record: 4-1 | 727.2(-0.5) | 5 | - |
Jeffrey Javier Prieto Record: 3-2 | - | 9 | - |
Record: 4-2 | 642.9(+24.2) | 9 | - |
Record: 5-2 | 608(+13.3) | 9 | - |
Liu Shao Chiang Record: 4-1 | - | 9 | - |
Record: 3-1 | 786.6(-9) | 9 | - |
Record: 4-1 | 628.8(+0.8) | 9 | - |
Record: 5-2 | 596.1(+29.9) | 9 | - |
Record: 3-1 | 724.7(-5.6) | 9 | - |
Record: 2-1 | 713.4(-13.6) | 17 | - |
Record: 2-1 | 648.3(-8.1) | 17 | - |
Record: 3-2 | 627(+15) | 17 | - |
Record: 3-2 | 468.6(+68.6) | 17 | - |
Record: 2-1 | 640.9(+6.3) | 17 | - |
Record: 2-1 | 687.5(-6.3) | 17 | - |
Record: 3-2 | 586.6(+86.6) | 17 | - |
Record: 2-2 | 644.4(+25.1) | 17 | - |
Record: 2-2 | 638.8(+28.8) | 17 | - |
| Stage | Match | Player 1 | Score | Player 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 31 | 731.2 | 11 - 10 | 727.5 | ||
WLLLWLLWLLWLWLWWLWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 30 | 721.7 | 10 - 3 | 678.6 | ||
LWWWWWWWLWLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 29 | 725.9 | 10 - 7 | 685.8 | ||
LLWLWLLWWWLWLWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 28 | 717.5 | 10 - 6 | 688.4 | ||
WWLLWWWLWWLWWLLW | ||||||
| 2 | 27 | 676.4 | 10 - 8 | 653.8 | ||
WLWWWLLLLLWLWWWWLW | ||||||
| 2 | 26 | 682.6 | 10 - 8 | 674.9 | ||
LWLWLWWWWLWLLWWLLW | ||||||
| 2 | 25 | 709.7 | 10 - 2 | 735.4 | ||
WLWLWWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 24 | 718.3 | 10 - 5 | - | ||
LLWWWWWWLWLLWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 23 | 684.5 | 10 - 6 | 650.5 | ||
LLLLLWWWLWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 22 | 644.1 | 10 - 8 | 732.7 | ||
WLLLLLLWWLWWLWWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 21 | 656.5 | 10 - 9 | 787.7 | ||
WWLWLWLLLLWWLLWWLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 20 | 681.9 | 10 - 8 | 601.8 | ||
LWWWLLWWLLLWWWLWLW | ||||||
| 2 | 19 | 661.0 | 10 - 1 | 642.3 | ||
WWWWWWWWWLW | ||||||
| 2 | 18 | 735.9 | 10 - 5 | 607.2 | ||
WWLLLLWWWWWWWLW | ||||||
| 2 | 17 | 701.9 | 10 - 4 | - | ||
WWWLWWLLLWWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 16 | 719.4 | 9 - 6 | 631.9 | ||
LLLWWWWLLLWWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 15 | - | 9 - 6 | - | ||
LLWLLWWWWWWLLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 14 | 641.1 | 9 - 8 | 692.9 | ||
WLLWWWWLWLLLLWLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 13 | 681.9 | 9 - 5 | 620.0 | ||
WLWWWLWWLWLLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 12 | 726.9 | 9 - 2 | 596.0 | ||
LWWLWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 11 | 638.7 | 9 - 8 | 690.8 | ||
LWWWLWWLLLLWWWLLW | ||||||
| 2 | 10 | 657.7 | 9 - 8 | 628.2 | ||
WLLLWLWWLWWLLLWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 9 | 788.6 | 9 - 4 | 631.0 | ||
WWLWWLLWWWWLW | ||||||
| 2 | 8 | 589.0 | 9 - 7 | 646.6 | ||
WWLLLLLWWLWWWLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 7 | 660.4 | 9 - 2 | 596.8 | ||
WWWWLWWLWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 6 | 632.3 | 9 - 3 | - | ||
WLWWWWWWLWLW | ||||||
| 2 | 5 | 655.8 | 9 - 7 | 665.0 | ||
LLWWLWLWWLLLWWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 4 | 735.6 | 9 - 2 | 483.7 | ||
WWWWWWLLWWW | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 597.3 | 9 - 7 | 631.7 | ||
LWWLWWLLLWWWLLWW | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | 684.1 | 9 - 0 | 662.6 | ||
| 2 | 1 | - | 9 - 6 | 703.8 | ||
LLWLWWLWLLWWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 208 | 455.9 | 9 - 7 | 541.4 | ||
LWLLWLLLWWWWWLWW | ||||||
| 1 | 207 | - | 9 - 5 | 475.5 | ||
WLWWLWWWLLWWLW | ||||||
| 1 | 206 | 624.1 | 9 - 5 | - | ||
WWLLWWWLLWWLWW | ||||||
| 1 | 205 | 600.1 | 9 - 0 | - | ||
WWWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 204 | - | 9 - 3 | - | ||
LWLWWWWWWWLW | ||||||
| 1 | 203 | 595.2 | 9 - 8 | 579.3 | ||
LLWWLLLWWWWWLLLWW | ||||||
| 1 | 202 | 558.2 | 9 - 1 | 639.7 | ||
LWWWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 201 | - | 9 - 3 | - | ||
LLWWLWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 200 | 659.1 | 9 - 4 | - | ||
LLLWLWWWWLWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 199 | 627.9 | 9 - 8 | 630.7 | ||
LWWLWWWLLLLLLWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 197 | 576.2 | 9 - 8 | 680.8 | ||
WWWLLWLWWLLLLWLWW | ||||||
| 1 | 196 | 583.4 | 9 - 5 | 600.9 | ||
WLWWWWLLWLWLWW | ||||||
| 1 | 195 | 542.7 | 9 - 0 | - | ||
WWWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 194 | 676.5 | 9 - 2 | 630.6 | ||
WWWLWWWWLWW | ||||||
| 1 | 193 | 677.5 | 9 - 1 | 501.0 | ||
WWLWWWWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 192 | 416.4 | 8 - 4 | - | ||
WLWLWLLWLWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 191 | - | 8 - 2 | - | ||
WLWWWWLWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 190 | 613.3 | 8 - 2 | - | ||
WWWLWLWWWW | ||||||
| 1 | 189 | - | 8 - 3 | 587.5 | ||
WWLWWLWLWWW | ||||||
Ping Chung Ko
Match Record: 7-0
Match Win %: 100.0%
Game Record: 68-37
Game Win %: 64.8%
Liu Yun Cheng
Match Record: 6-1
Match Win %: 85.7%
Game Record: 59-44
Game Win %: 57.3%
Ping Han Ko
Match Record: 5-1
Match Win %: 83.3%
Game Record: 54-36
Game Win %: 60.0%
Jui An Hsu
Match Record: 4-1
Match Win %: 80.0%
Game Record: 45-31
Game Win %: 59.2%
Kun Lin Wu
Match Record: 4-1
Match Win %: 80.0%
Game Record: 43-32
Game Win %: 57.3%
Liu Shao Chiang
Match Record: 4-1
Match Win %: 80.0%
Game Record: 41-32
Game Win %: 56.2%
Po Cheng Kuo
Match Record: 4-1
Match Win %: 80.0%
Game Record: 45-32
Game Win %: 58.4%
Robbie Capito
Match Record: 4-1
Match Win %: 80.0%
Game Record: 39-23
Game Win %: 62.9%
Seo Seoa
Match Record: 4-1
Match Win %: 80.0%
Game Record: 37-27
Game Win %: 57.8%
Jung Lin Chang
Match Record: 6-2
Match Win %: 75.0%
Game Record: 75-40
Game Win %: 65.2%
| # | Player | Match Record | Win % | Game Record | Game Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ping Chung Ko | 7-0 | 100.0% | 68-37 | 64.8% |
| 2 | Liu Yun Cheng | 6-1 | 85.7% | 59-44 | 57.3% |
| 3 | Ping Han Ko | 5-1 | 83.3% | 54-36 | 60.0% |
| 4 | Jui An Hsu | 4-1 | 80.0% | 45-31 | 59.2% |
| 5 | Kun Lin Wu | 4-1 | 80.0% | 43-32 | 57.3% |
| 6 | Liu Shao Chiang | 4-1 | 80.0% | 41-32 | 56.2% |
| 7 | Po Cheng Kuo | 4-1 | 80.0% | 45-32 | 58.4% |
| 8 | Robbie Capito | 4-1 | 80.0% | 39-23 | 62.9% |
| 9 | Seo Seoa | 4-1 | 80.0% | 37-27 | 57.8% |
| 10 | Jung Lin Chang | 6-2 | 75.0% | 75-40 | 65.2% |